ArticleslgStudy

science

Theories of second-language acquisition

Theories of second-language acquisition is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Theories of second-language acquisition rather than just read about it. In short: The main purpose of theories of second-language acquisition (SLA) is to shed light on how people who already know one language learn a second language. The field of second-language acquisition involves various contributions, such as linguistics, sociolinguistics, psychology, cognitive science, neuroscience, and education.

Theories of second-language acquisition — main illustration
Theories of second-language acquisition — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Theories of second-language acquisition belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Theories of second-language acquisition to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Theories of second-language acquisition from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The main purpose of theories of second-language acquisition (SLA) is to shed light on how people who already know one language learn a second language. The field of second-language acquisition involves various contributions, such as linguistics, sociolinguistics, psychology, cognitive science, neuroscience, and education. These multiple fields in second-language acquisition can be grouped as four major research strands: (a) linguistic dimensions of SLA, (b) cognitive (but not linguistic) dimensions of SLA, (c) socio-cultural dimensions of SLA, and (d) instructional dimensions of SLA. While the orientation of each research strand is distinct, they are in common in that they can guide us to find helpful condition to facilitate successful language learning. Acknowledging the contributions of each perspective and the interdisciplinarity between each field, more and more second language researchers are now trying to have a bigger lens on examining the complexities of second language acquisition.

History As SLA began as an interdisciplinary field, it is hard to pin down a precise starting date. However, there are two publications in particular that are seen as instrumental to the development of the modern study of SLA: (1) Corder's 1967 essay The Significance of Learners' Errors, and (2) Selinker's 1972 article Interlanguage. Corder's essay rejected a behaviorist account of SLA and suggested that learners made use of intrinsic internal linguistic processes; Selinker's article argued that second-language learners possess their own individual linguistic systems that are independent from both the first and second languages. In the 1970s the general trend in SLA was for research exploring the ideas of Corder and Selinker, and refuting behaviorist theories of language acquisition. Examples include research into error analysis, studies in transitional stages of second-language ability, and the "morpheme studies" investigating the order in which learners acquired linguistic features. The 70s were dominated by naturalistic studies of people learning English as a second language. By the 1980s, the theories of Stephen Krashen's had become the prominent paradigm in the field of SLA. In his theories, often collectively known as the Input Hypothesis, Krashen suggested that language acquisition is driven solely by comprehensible input, language input that learners can understand. Krashen's model was influential in the field of SLA and also had a large influence on language teaching. During this period, new theories such as Michael Long's Interaction Hypothesis, Merrill Swain's Output Hypothesis, and Richard Schmidt's Noticing Hypothesis were introduced. Additionally, notable contributions included White's descriptions of learner competence and Pienemann's use of speech processing models and lexical functional grammar to explain learner output. This period also saw the beginning of approaches based in other disciplines, such as the psychological approach of connectionism. The 1990s were characterized by two major areas of research focus: linguistic theories of SLA based on Noam Chomsky's Universal Grammar and psychological approaches such as skill acquisition theory and connectionism. This era also saw the development of new frameworks, including Processability Theory and Input Processing Theory. Furthermore, sociocultural theory, which explains SLA in terms of the learner's social environment, and approaches influenced by complexity science were introduced during this period. These trends persisted into the 2000s, with research remaining divided between linguistic and psychological approaches. Scholars like VanPatten and Benati have noted that this division is unlikely to change in the near future, given the strong support both areas receive from the broader fields of linguistics and psychology, respectively.

Early cognitive approaches to SLA These hypotheses collectively belong to early cognitive approaches to SLA, emphasizing the importance of input, output, and learner interaction in the acquisition process.

Input hypothesis

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Theories of second-language acquisition: An example of declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, and conditional knowledge
An example of declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, and conditional knowledge
Theories of second-language acquisition: Larsen-Freeman
Larsen-Freeman

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Theories of second-language acquisition

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Theories of second-language acquisition claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Theories of second-language acquisition before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Theories of second-language acquisition ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Theories of second-language acquisition

In research
Theories of second-language acquisition appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Theories of second-language acquisition in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Theories of second-language acquisition is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Second-language acquisition, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Theories of second-language acquisition outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Theories of second-language acquisition” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Theories of second-language acquisition in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Theories of second-language acquisition means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Theories of second-language acquisition out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Theories of second-language acquisition in simple terms?

The main purpose of theories of second-language acquisition (SLA) is to shed light on how people who already know one language learn a second language. The field of second-language acquisition involves various contributions, such as linguistics, sociolinguistics, psychology, cognitive science, neur…

Why does Theories of second-language acquisition matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Theories of second-language acquisition?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Theories of second-language acquisition.

Tags

  • Second-language acquisition

Keep exploring