ArticleslgStudy

biology

Therapeutic nihilism

Therapeutic nihilism is a biology topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Therapeutic nihilism rather than just read about it. In short: Therapeutic nihilism is the contention that it is impossible to cure people or societies of their ills through treatment. Another definition stems from William M.

Therapeutic nihilism — main illustration
Therapeutic nihilism — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Therapeutic nihilism belongs to biology; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Therapeutic nihilism to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Therapeutic nihilism from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Therapeutic nihilism is the contention that it is impossible to cure people or societies of their ills through treatment. Another definition stems from William M. Johnston's cultural history of the late Austrian double monarchy: Indifference to political and social reform. In medicine, it was connected to the idea that many "cures" do more harm than good, and that one should instead encourage the body to heal itself. Michel de Montaigne espoused this view in his Essais in 1580. This position was later popular, among other places, in France in the 1820s and 1830s, but has mostly faded away in the modern era due to the development of provably effective medicines such as antibiotics.

History Around the late 19th century, therapeutic nihilism gained some prominence among medical professionals. Proponents of this view claimed that every man should be his own physician through democratization of knowledge. Cultural critic Matthew Arnold was quoted as saying that "the stream of tendency of modern medical thought was toward a therapeutic nihilism." The most preferred approach to medicine at the time was what was sometimes called active medication, in which therapies were given acutely and would be expected to have dramatic effects. Active medication represented, to some degree, the cutting edge of existing medical thought, which also led to assumptions and inaccuracies. For example, when cocaine was first discovered, it was described in medical literature to be useful in conditions ranging from gastralgia, to childbirth (as a local anaesthetic), to migraine, to shingles, to nasal hemorrhage (due to its vasoconstrictive properties). This was in contrast to routine therapy, where the patient took the same medication consistently. Culturally, doctors were considered heroic figures when active medication worked while unsuccessful cases could be labeled as unfortunate and dismissed. Robert Bartholow, a contemporary physician, said "the science of therapeutics should be made more certain" and that the "true knowledge of drug action is not widely enough diffused." When faced with everyday exigencies, many physicians were left clueless. The medical community shared these concerns: in 1888, the president of the American Medical Association was quoted as saying that there were "odious defects in the American medical education system" and expressed concern that the ratio of medical practitioners to the US population (1 per 580 persons) was both excessive relative to actual need, and founded on a plethora of low-quality graduates of lower-quality medical schools who were looking only for an income, leading to supply-driven overuse of medical therapy. Therapeutic nihilism slowly faded in the 19th century as systematic reform of the medical education system took place, then reappeared in the 20th century in a slightly different fashion than prior. The aggressive empiricism of the 19th century enlightened the medical society of the need to thoroughly evaluate every aspect of clinical practice. Prior to the publication of rigorous research later in the 20th century, some physicians believed the most potent weapon for treatment was not medication, but the regulation of bodily secretions such as bloodletting, promotion of perspiration, or urination to regain the natural state of equilibrium. Ivan Illich was one of the ardent supporters of therapeutic nihilism. In his book Medical Nemesis, Illich claimed that the great increase in life expectancy and public health experienced in his era was due to improved nutrition and sanitation, rather than innovation in drugs and medicines. He also believed there was an excess of physicians, surgeries and prescriptions. Therapeutic nihilists claimed such excess often led to malpractice and increase in iatrogenic (doctor-caused) injuries, accusing the physicians of creating even more illnesses. Therapeutic nihilism mostly faded by the mid-20th century, and some researchers have concluded that "therapeutic nihilism was replaced by an armamentarium of therapeutic inventions." The phrase therapeutic nihilism is included in a modern version of the Hippocratic Oath, traditionally taken by physicians upon graduation, "... I will apply for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of over-treatment and therapeutic nihilism."

References

External links Media related to Therapeutic nihilism at Wikimedia Commons

Illustrations

Therapeutic nihilism: In the 19th century, there was a lack of confidence in the remedies of the day.  Oliver Wendell Holmes said, "...if the whole materia medica, as now used, could be sunk to the bottom of the sea, it would be so much the better for mankind – and all the worse for the fishes."[1]
In the 19th century, there was a lack of confidence in the remedies of the day. Oliver Wendell Holmes said, "...if the whole materia medica, as now used, could be sunk to the bottom of the sea, it would be so much the better for mankind – and all the worse for the fishes."[1]

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Therapeutic nihilism

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Therapeutic nihilism claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In biology, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Therapeutic nihilism before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Therapeutic nihilism ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Therapeutic nihilism

In research
Therapeutic nihilism appears in biology research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Therapeutic nihilism in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Therapeutic nihilism is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Concepts in alternative medicine, Nihilism, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Therapeutic nihilism outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Therapeutic nihilism” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Therapeutic nihilism in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Therapeutic nihilism means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Therapeutic nihilism out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Therapeutic nihilism in simple terms?

Therapeutic nihilism is the contention that it is impossible to cure people or societies of their ills through treatment. Another definition stems from William M.

Why does Therapeutic nihilism matter?

Because it connects several biology ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Therapeutic nihilism?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Therapeutic nihilism.

Tags

  • Concepts in alternative medicine
  • Nihilism

Keep exploring