ArticleslgStudy

science

Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis

Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis rather than just read about it. In short: In the field of time–frequency analysis, several signal formulations are used to represent the signal in a joint time–frequency domain. There are several methods and transforms called "time-frequency distributions" (TFDs), whose interconnections were organized by Leon Cohen.

Key takeaways

  • Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

In the field of time–frequency analysis, several signal formulations are used to represent the signal in a joint time–frequency domain. There are several methods and transforms called "time-frequency distributions" (TFDs), whose interconnections were organized by Leon Cohen.

The most useful and popular methods form a class referred to as "quadratic" or bilinear time–frequency distributions. A core member of this class is the Wigner–Ville distribution (WVD), as all other TFDs can be written as a smoothed or convolved versions of the WVD. Another popular member of this class is the spectrogram which is the square of the magnitude of the short-time Fourier transform (STFT). The spectrogram has the advantage of being positive and is easy to interpret, but also has disadvantages, like being irreversible, which means that once the spectrogram of a signal is computed, the original signal can't be extracted from the spectrogram. The theory and methodology for defining a TFD that verifies certain desirable properties is given in the "Theory of Quadratic TFDs". The scope of this article is to illustrate some elements of the procedure to transform one distribution into another. The method used to transform a distribution is borrowed from the phase space formulation of quantum mechanics, even though the subject matter of this article is "signal processing". Noting that a signal can be recovered from a particular distribution under certain conditions, given a certain TFD ρ1(t,f) representing the signal in a joint time–frequency domain, another, different, TFD ρ2(t,f) of the same signal can be obtained to calculate any other distribution, by simple smoothing or filtering; some of these relationships are shown below. A full treatment of the question can be given in Cohen's book.

General class If we use the variable ω = 2πf, then, borrowing the notations used in the field of quantum mechanics, we can show that time–frequency representation, such as Wigner distribution function (WDF) and other bilinear time–frequency distributions, can be expressed as

where ϕ ( θ , τ ) {\displaystyle \phi (\theta ,\tau )} is a two dimensional function called the kernel, which determines the distribution and its properties (for a signal processing terminology and treatment of this question, the reader is referred to the references already cited in the introduction). The kernel of the Wigner distribution function (WDF) is one. However, no particular significance should be attached to that, since it is possible to write the general form so that the kernel of any distribution is one, in which case the kernel of the Wigner distribution function (WDF) would be something else.

Characteristic function formulation The characteristic function is the double Fourier transform of the distribution. By inspection of Eq. (1), we can obtain that

where

and where A ( θ , τ ) {\displaystyle A(\theta ,\tau )} is the symmetrical ambiguity function. The characteristic function may be appropriately called the generalized ambiguity function.

Transformation between distributions To obtain that relationship suppose that there are two distributions, C 1 {\displaystyle C_{1}} and C 2 {\displaystyle C_{2}} , with corresponding kernels, ϕ 1 {\displaystyle \phi _{1}} and ϕ 2 {\displaystyle \phi _{2}} . Their characteristic functions are

Divide one equation by the other to obtain

This is an important relationship because it connects the characteristic functions. For the division to be proper the kernel cannot to be zero in a finite region. To obtain the relationship between the distributions take the double Fourier transform of both sides and use Eq. (2)

Now express M 2 {\displaystyle M_{2}} in terms of C 2 {\displaystyle C_{2}} to obtain

This relationship can be written as

with

Relation of the spectrogram to other bilinear representations Now we specialize to the case where one transform from an arbitrary representation to the spectrogram. In Eq. (9), both C 1 {\displaystyle C_{1}} to be the spectrogram and C 2 {\displaystyle C_{2}} to be arbitrary are set. In addition, to simplify notation, ϕ S P = ϕ 1 , ϕ = ϕ 2 {\displaystyle \phi _{SP}=\phi _{1},\phi =\phi _{2}} , and g S P = g 12 {\displaystyle g_{SP}=g_{12}} are set and written as

The kernel for the spectrogram with window, h ( t ) {\displaystyle h(t)} , is A h ( − θ , τ ) {\displaystyle A_{h}(-\theta ,\tau )} and therefore

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis

In research
Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Time–frequency analysis, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis in simple terms?

In the field of time–frequency analysis, several signal formulations are used to represent the signal in a joint time–frequency domain. There are several methods and transforms called "time-frequency distributions" (TFDs), whose interconnections were organized by Leon Cohen.

Why does Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis.

Tags

  • Time–frequency analysis

Keep exploring