ArticleslgStudy

biology

Two-hit hypothesis

Two-hit hypothesis is a biology topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Two-hit hypothesis rather than just read about it. In short: The two-hit hypothesis, also known as the Knudson hypothesis, is the hypothesis that most tumor suppressor genes require both alleles to be inactivated, either through mutations or through epigenetic silencing, to cause a phenotypic change. It was first formulated by Alfred G.

Two-hit hypothesis — main illustration
Two-hit hypothesis — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Two-hit hypothesis belongs to biology; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Two-hit hypothesis to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Two-hit hypothesis from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The two-hit hypothesis, also known as the Knudson hypothesis, is the hypothesis that most tumor suppressor genes require both alleles to be inactivated, either through mutations or through epigenetic silencing, to cause a phenotypic change. It was first formulated by Alfred G. Knudson in 1971 and led indirectly to the identification of tumor suppressor genes. Knudson won the 1998 Albert Lasker Clinical Medical Research Award for this work. Knudson performed a statistical analysis on cases of retinoblastoma, a malignant tumor of the retina that occurs both as an inherited disease and sporadically. He noted that inherited retinoblastoma occurs at a younger age than the sporadic disease. In addition, the children with inherited retinoblastoma often developed the tumor in both eyes, suggesting an underlying predisposition. Knudson suggested that two "hits" to DNA were necessary to cause the cancer. In the children with inherited retinoblastoma, the first mutation in what later came to be identified as the RB1 gene, was inherited, the second one acquired. In non-inherited retinoblastoma, instead two mutations, or "hits", had to take place before a tumor could develop, explaining the later onset. It was later found that carcinogenesis (the development of cancer) depended both on the mutation of proto-oncogenes (genes that stimulate cell proliferation) and on the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, that keep proliferation in check. Knudson's hypothesis refers specifically, however, to the heterozygosity of tumor suppressor genes. An inactivation of both alleles is required, as a single functional tumor suppressor allele is usually sufficient. Some tumor suppressor genes have been found to be "dose-dependent" so that inhibition of one copy of the gene (either via genetic or epigenetic modification) may encourage a malignant phenotype, which is termed haploinsufficiency.

Related ideas Field cancerization may be an extended form of the Knudson hypothesis. This is the phenomenon of various primary tumors developing in one particular area of the body, suggesting that an earlier "hit" predisposed the whole area for cancer. Announced in 2011, chromothripsis similarly involves multiple mutations, but asserts that they may all appear at once. This idea, affecting only 2–3% of cases of cancer, although up to 25% of bone cancers, involves the catastrophic shattering of a chromosome into tens or hundreds of pieces and then being patched back together incorrectly. This shattering, it is presumed, takes place when the chromosomes are compacted during normal cell division, but the trigger for the shattering is unknown. Under this model, cancer arises as the result of a single, isolated event, rather than the slow accumulation of multiple mutations. The exact function of some tumor suppressor genes is not currently known (e.g. MEN1, WT1), but based on these genes following the Knudson "two-hit" hypothesis, they are strongly presumed to be suppressor genes.

Applications to other diseases The hypothesis has been applied to other diseases as well. On example is Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). However, the application to NAFLD is considered in published medical research as obsolete as well to not have been determined. The hypothesis of "multiple hit" hypothesis is considered a more accurate depict the pathogenesis of NAFLD for those who are genetically predisposed to the disease.

References

Illustrations

Two-hit hypothesis: Illustration of two-hit hypothesis
Illustration of two-hit hypothesis

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Two-hit hypothesis

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Two-hit hypothesis claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In biology, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Two-hit hypothesis before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Two-hit hypothesis ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Two-hit hypothesis

In research
Two-hit hypothesis appears in biology research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Two-hit hypothesis in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Two-hit hypothesis is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Carcinogenesis, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Two-hit hypothesis outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Two-hit hypothesis in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Two-hit hypothesis means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Two-hit hypothesis out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Two-hit hypothesis in simple terms?

The two-hit hypothesis, also known as the Knudson hypothesis, is the hypothesis that most tumor suppressor genes require both alleles to be inactivated, either through mutations or through epigenetic silencing, to cause a phenotypic change. It was first formulated by Alfred G.

Why does Two-hit hypothesis matter?

Because it connects several biology ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Two-hit hypothesis?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Two-hit hypothesis.

Tags

  • Carcinogenesis

Keep exploring