ArticleslgStudy

biology

Two-streams hypothesis

Two-streams hypothesis is a biology topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Two-streams hypothesis rather than just read about it. In short: The two-streams hypothesis is a model of the neural processing of vision as well as hearing. The hypothesis, given its initial characterisation in papers by Leslie Ungerleider and Mortimer Mishkin in 1982 argued that primates possess two distinct visual systems.

Two-streams hypothesis — main illustration
Two-streams hypothesis — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Two-streams hypothesis belongs to biology; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Two-streams hypothesis to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Two-streams hypothesis from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The two-streams hypothesis is a model of the neural processing of vision as well as hearing. The hypothesis, given its initial characterisation in papers by Leslie Ungerleider and Mortimer Mishkin in 1982 argued that primates possess two distinct visual systems. A decade later, David Milner and Melvyn A. Goodale in 1992, developed this further. Recently there seems to be evidence of two distinct auditory systems as well. As visual information exits the occipital lobe, and as sound leaves the phonological network, it follows two main pathways, or "streams". The ventral stream (also known as the "what pathway") leads to the temporal lobe, which is involved with object and visual identification and recognition. The dorsal stream (or, "where pathway") leads to the parietal lobe, which is involved with processing the object's spatial location relative to the viewer and with speech repetition.

History

Several researchers had proposed similar ideas previously. The authors themselves credit the inspiration of work on blindsight by Weiskrantz, and previous neuroscientific vision research. Schneider first proposed the existence of two visual systems for localisation and identification in 1969. Ingle described two independent visual systems in frogs in 1973. Ettlinger reviewed the existing neuropsychological evidence of a distinction in 1990. Moreover, Trevarthen had offered an account of two separate mechanisms of vision in monkeys back in 1968. In 1982, Ungerleider and Mishkin distinguished the dorsal and ventral streams, as processing spatial and visual features respectively, from their lesion studies of monkeys – proposing the original where vs what distinction. Though this framework was superseded by that of Milner & Goodale, it remains influential. One hugely influential source of information that has informed the model has been experimental work exploring the extant abilities of visual agnosic patient D.F. The first, and most influential report, came from Goodale and colleagues in 1991 and work is still being published on her two decades later. This has been the focus of some criticism of the model due to the perceived over-reliance on findings from a single case.

Two visual systems Goodale and Milner amassed an array of anatomical, neuropsychological, electrophysiological, and behavioural evidence for their model. According to their data, the ventral 'perceptual' stream computes a detailed map of the world from visual input, which can then be used for cognitive operations, and the dorsal 'action' stream transforms incoming visual information to the requisite egocentric (head-centered) coordinate system for skilled motor planning. The model also posits that visual perception encodes spatial properties of objects, such as size and location, relative to other objects in the visual field; in other words, it utilizes relative metrics and scene-based frames of reference. Visual action planning and coordination, on the other hand, uses absolute metrics determined via egocentric frames of reference, computing the actual properties of objects relative to the observer. Thus, grasping movements directed towards objects embedded in size-contrast-ambiguous scenes have been shown to escape the effects of these illusions, as different frames of references and metrics are involved in the perception of the illusion versus the execution of the grasping act. Norman proposed a similar dual-process model of vision, and described eight main differences between the two systems consistent with other two-system models.

Dorsal stream

The dorsal stream is proposed to be involved in the guidance of actions and recognizing where objects are in space. The dorsal stream projects from the primary visual cortex to the posterior parietal cortex. It was initially termed the "where" pathway since it was thought that the dorsal stream processes information regarding the spatial properties of an object. However, later research conducted on a famous neuropsychological patient, Patient D.F., revealed that the dorsal stream is responsible for processing the visual information needed to construct the representations of objects one wishes to manipulate. Those findings led the nickname of the dorsal stream to be updated to the "how" pathway. The dorsal stream is interconnected with the parallel ventral stream (the "what" stream) which runs downward from V1 into the temporal lobe.

General features The dorsal stream is involved in spatial awareness and guidance of actions (e.g., reaching). In this it has two distinct functional characteristics—it contains a detailed map of the visual field, and is also good at detecting and analyzing movements. The dorsal stream commences with purely visual functions in the occipital lobe before gradually transferring to spatial awareness at its termination in the parietal lobe. The posterior parietal cortex is essential for "the perception and interpretation of spatial relationships, accurate body image, and the learning of tasks involving coordination of the body in space". It contains individually functioning lobules. The lateral intraparietal sulcus (LIP) contains neurons that produce enhanced activation when attention is moved onto the stimulus or the animal saccades towards a visual stimulus, and the ventral intraparietal sulcus (VIP) where visual and somatosensory information are integrated.

Effects of damage or lesions Damage to the posterior parietal cortex causes a number of spatial disorders including:

Simultanagnosia: where the patient can only describe single objects without the ability to perceive it as a component of a set of details or objects in a context (as in a scenario, e.g. the forest for the trees). Optic ataxia: where the patient cannot use visuospatial information to guide arm movements. Hemispatial neglect: where the patient is unaware of the contralesional half of space (that is, they are unaware of things in their left field of view and focus only on objects in the right field of view; or appear unaware of things in one field of view when they perceive them in the other). For example, a person with this disorder may draw a clock, and then label all twelve of the numbers on one side of the face and consider the drawing complete. Akinetopsia: inability to perceive motion. Apraxia: inability to produce discretionary or volitional movement in the absence of muscular disorders.

Ventral stream

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Two-streams hypothesis: Connections of dorsal visual stream
Connections of dorsal visual stream
Two-streams hypothesis: Ventromedial view of visual stream
Ventromedial view of visual stream
Two-streams hypothesis: Ventolateral view of visual stream
Ventolateral view of visual stream
Two-streams hypothesis: comprehension of the phrase 'my cat' in the extended version of Hickok and Poeppel's dual pathway model
comprehension of the phrase 'my cat' in the extended version of Hickok and Poeppel's dual pathway model
Two-streams hypothesis: repetition of the phrase 'what is your name?' in the extended version of Hickok and Poeppel's dual pathway model
repetition of the phrase 'what is your name?' in the extended version of Hickok and Poeppel's dual pathway model

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Two-streams hypothesis

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Two-streams hypothesis claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In biology, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Two-streams hypothesis before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Two-streams hypothesis ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Two-streams hypothesis

In research
Two-streams hypothesis appears in biology research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Two-streams hypothesis in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Two-streams hypothesis is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Auditory system, Cerebrum, Cognitive neuroscience, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Two-streams hypothesis outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Two-streams hypothesis in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Two-streams hypothesis means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Two-streams hypothesis out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Two-streams hypothesis in simple terms?

The two-streams hypothesis is a model of the neural processing of vision as well as hearing. The hypothesis, given its initial characterisation in papers by Leslie Ungerleider and Mortimer Mishkin in 1982 argued that primates possess two distinct visual systems.

Why does Two-streams hypothesis matter?

Because it connects several biology ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Two-streams hypothesis?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Two-streams hypothesis.

Tags

  • Auditory system
  • Cerebrum
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Visual system

Keep exploring