engineering

Two Rivers Detention Facility

Two Rivers Detention Facility is a engineering topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Two Rivers Detention Facility rather than just read about it. In short: The Rocky Mountain Regional Detention Facility, formerly known as the Two Rivers Regional Detention Facility, is a privately owned, government-operated detention facility located in Hardin, Montana, which was first proposed as economic development in 2004, and was completed in the summer of 2007. It first held prisoners in 2014, substantially under capacity, until it was closed in 2016.

Key takeaways

Two Rivers Detention Facility belongs to engineering; place it in that map before memorising details.
Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
Connect Two Rivers Detention Facility to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
Reproduce the core statement of Two Rivers Detention Facility from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Rocky Mountain Regional Detention Facility, formerly known as the Two Rivers Regional Detention Facility, is a privately owned, government-operated detention facility located in Hardin, Montana, which was first proposed as economic development in 2004, and was completed in the summer of 2007. It first held prisoners in 2014, substantially under capacity, until it was closed in 2016. Two Rivers Authority concluded a lease arrangement with the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in December 2018, and the BIA took possession and began operations in April 2019.

Construction The 464-bed minimum security detention facility was completed in September 2007, built with $27.4 million in high interest revenue bonds issued by the city's new industrial development corporation, the Two Rivers Port Authority (TRA) and sold by bond brokers Municipal Capital Markets and Herbert J. Sims. It fostered the hopes of creating 100-plus jobs and stimulating the economy of the small town of 3,400. The facility was promoted by a consortium of mostly Texan bond brokers, builders (Hale-Mills construction), architects (James Parkey/Corplan) and operators (Civigenics/Community Education Centers), despite an initial economic feasibility analysis that concluded it would not be a viable project, and despite substantial legislative obstacles.

Struggle to find clients Once complete, because of various legal and political issues, Two Rivers Authority and the original operator were unable to obtain any contracts to house inmates. Although five interest payments had been made from the bond issue's reserve fund, the bonds were declared in technical default in May 2008. In the fall of 2008, unsuccessful at attracting contracts from various counties, states, tribes and federal agencies, it was proposed to the State of Montana to house a sexual offender program. Hardin's incomplete bid was twice rejected. In January 2009, the two-year contract was not renewed and the operator, Civigenics/Community Education Centers, withdrew its last two employees that it had imported from Texas. In March 2009, the Hardin City Council voted 5-0 to back a proposal to bring detainees from the United States detention camps at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to Hardin, although state congressional leaders had opposed the plan. On September 3–4, 2009, the economic development director, the attorney and the vice president of Hardin's TRA negotiated a draft contract with a Southern Californian confidence man, "Michael Hilton." Hilton was an ex-convict Serbian immigrant with more than a dozen aliases and criminal convictions, who lost many fraud, rescission and unlawful detainer cases with over $1 million in adverse judgments against him. Despite the furor, elected and appointed officials from Hardin continued to vouch for the viability of the contract and for Hilton's alleged reformation. The bondholding investors and trustee, whose agreement was necessary for the contract to be accepted, hesitated to comply. By January 2010, the TRA had hired its fifth director who was laboring to find inmates for the empty jail. There remained about $814,000 remaining in a "reserve fund" managed by the trustee of the bonds sold to build the facility. That money was earmarked to pay insurance, heat, electricity and the bare minimum of services the building requires to be operational. "Kim Hammond, mayor of Hardin, has warned cities...to tread lightly when considering the proposals brought forth by private companies like Corplan." In October 2011, Two Rivers Authority responded to a Request for Information by the Montana Department of Corrections. In late January 2012, the Montana Department of Corrections issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) seeking 120 beds for special-needs inmates. The RFP was cancelled and DOC Director Mike Ferriter indicated that it might not be reissued at all.

Under Emerald In April 2014, Emerald Correctional Management, LLC, of Louisiana renewed efforts to obtain contracts to get it operational, holding a job fair to recruit potential employees. In May 2014, Two Rivers Authority and Emerald Correctional Management, LLC, completed contracts relating to the startup and operational management of the Facility. After being vacant for over seven years after construction was completed, the Facility became operational in July 2014 and in August 2014 accepted the first inmate. By early October, with Emerald Corrections operating the facility, the inmate population had increased to almost 60. By February 2016, although at one point the inmate population had swelled to 250 with Native Americans and North Dakota county jail prisoners, it was once again empty. By then, its bond indebtedness, thanks to non-payment on debt and interest accrued, had increased to over $40 million. Emerald ceased all business in 2017.

Most recent efforts to utilize facility Montana U.S. Senator Steve Daines pressed the Bureau of Indian Affairs to contract with the facility, hoping to hold prisoners by January 2018. Two Rivers Authority concluded a lease arrangement with the Bureau of Indian Affairs in December 2018; the BIA took possession and began operations in April 2019.

References

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Two Rivers Detention Facility

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Two Rivers Detention Facility claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In engineering, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Two Rivers Detention Facility before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Two Rivers Detention Facility ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Two Rivers Detention Facility

In research: Two Rivers Detention Facility appears in engineering research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry: Engineering practice reuses Two Rivers Detention Facility in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom: Two Rivers Detention Facility is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 2014 establishments in Montana, Buildings and structures completed in 2007, Buildings and structures in Big Horn County, Montana, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life: Look for Two Rivers Detention Facility outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.

Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Two Rivers Detention Facility” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Two Rivers Detention Facility in 20 minutes

Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
Close the page and write down what Two Rivers Detention Facility means in your own words.
Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
Explain Two Rivers Detention Facility out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Two Rivers Detention Facility in simple terms?

Why does Two Rivers Detention Facility matter?

Because it connects several engineering ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Two Rivers Detention Facility?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Two Rivers Detention Facility.