Udayadivākara (c. 1073 CE) was an Indian astronomer and mathematician who authored an influential and elaborate commentary, called Sundari, on Laghu-bhāskarīya of Bhāskara I. No personal details about Udayadivākara are known. Since the commentary Sundari takes the year 1073 CE as its epoch, probably the commentary was completed about that year. Sundari has not yet been published and is available only in manuscript form. Some of these manuscripts are preserved in the manuscript depositories in Thiruvananthapuram. According to K. V. Sarma, historian of the astronomy and mathematics of the Kerala school, Udayadivākara probably hailed from Kerala, India.
Historical significance of Sundari Apart from the fact that Sundari is an elaborate commentary, it has some historical significance. It has quoted extensively from a now lost work by a little-known mathematician Jayadeva. The quotations relate to the cakravala method for solving indeterminate integral equations of the form N x 2 + 1 = y 2 {\displaystyle Nx^{2}+1=y^{2}} . This shows that the method predates Bhaskara II contrary to generally held beliefs. Another important reference to Jayadeva’s work is the solution of the indeterminate equation of the form N x 2 + C = y 2 {\displaystyle Nx^{2}+C=y^{2}} , C {\displaystyle C} being positive or negative.
A problem and its solution Udayadivākara used his method for solving the equation N x 2 + C = y 2 {\displaystyle Nx^{2}+C=y^{2}} to obtain some particular solutions to a certain algebraic problem. The problem and Udayadivākara's solution to the problem are presented below only to illustrate the techniques used by Indian astronomers for solving algebraic equations.
Problem Find positive integers x {\displaystyle x} and y {\displaystyle y} satisfying the following conditions:
x + y = a prefect square , x − y = a prefect square , x y + 1 = a prefect square . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x+y&={\text{a prefect square}},\\x-y&={\text{a prefect square}},\\xy+1&={\text{a prefect square}}.\end{aligned}}}
Solution To solve the problem, Udayadivākara makes a series of apparently arbitrary assumptions all aimed at reducing the problem to one of solving an indeterminate equation of the form N x 2 + C = y 2 {\displaystyle Nx^{2}+C=y^{2}} . Udayadivākara begins by assuming that x y + 1 = ( 2 y + 1 ) 2 {\displaystyle xy+1=(2y+1)^{2}} which can be written in the form x − y = 3 y + 4 {\displaystyle x-y=3y+4} . He next assumes that 3 y + 4 = ( 3 z + 2 ) 2 {\displaystyle 3y+4=(3z+2)^{2}} which, together with the earlier equation, yields
x = 12 z 2 + 16 z + 4 , y = 3 z 2 + 4 z , x + y = 15 z 2 + 20 z + 4. {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=12z^{2}+16z+4,\\y&=3z^{2}+4z,\\x+y&=15z^{2}+20z+4.\end{aligned}}}
Now, Udayadivākara puts
15 z 2 + 20 z + 4 = u 2 {\displaystyle 15z^{2}+20z+4=u^{2}}
which is then transformed to the equation
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
