ArticleslgStudy

biology

Unethical human experimentation in the United States

Unethical human experimentation in the United States is a biology topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Unethical human experimentation in the United States rather than just read about it. In short: Numerous experiments which were performed on human test subjects in the United States in the past are now considered to have been unethical, because they were performed without the knowledge or informed consent of the test subjects. Such tests have been performed throughout American history, but have become significantly less frequent with the advent and adoption of various safeguarding efforts.

Unethical human experimentation in the United States — main illustration
Unethical human experimentation in the United States — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Unethical human experimentation in the United States belongs to biology; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Unethical human experimentation in the United States to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Unethical human experimentation in the United States from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Numerous experiments which were performed on human test subjects in the United States in the past are now considered to have been unethical, because they were performed without the knowledge or informed consent of the test subjects. Such tests have been performed throughout American history, but have become significantly less frequent with the advent and adoption of various safeguarding efforts. Despite these safeguards, unethical experimentation involving human subjects is still occasionally uncovered. Past examples of unethical experiments include the exposure of humans to chemical and biological weapons (including infections with deadly or debilitating diseases), human radiation experiments, injections of toxic and radioactive chemicals, surgical experiments, interrogation and torture experiments, tests which involve mind-altering substances, and a wide variety of other experiments. Many of these tests are performed on children, the sick, and mentally disabled individuals, often under the guise of "medical treatment". In many of the studies, a large portion of the subjects were poor, racial minorities, or prisoners. Many of these experiments violated US law even at the time and were in some cases directly sponsored by government agencies or rogue elements thereof, including the Centers for Disease Control, the United States military, and the Central Intelligence Agency; and in other cases were sponsored by private corporations which were involved in military activities. The human research programs were usually highly secretive and performed without the knowledge or authorization of Congress, and in many cases information about them was not released until many years after the studies had been performed. The ethical, professional, and legal implications of this in the United States medical and scientific community were quite significant and led to many institutions and policies that attempted to ensure that future human subject research in the United States would be ethical and legal. Public outrage in the late 20th century over the discovery of government experiments on human subjects led to numerous congressional investigations and hearings, including the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission, both of 1975, and the 1994 Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, among others.

Surgical experiments Throughout the 1840s, J. Marion Sims, who is often referred to as "the father of gynecology," performed surgical experiments on infants, enslaved African women, and girls as young as 13 without anesthesia to treat conditions including vesicovaginal fistula, neonatal tetanus, and other similar conditions. Slaveowners were willing to negotiate with Sims for access to these women due to their fertility's economic value if cured. The patients—one of whom was operated on 30 times—suffered from infections and many failed surgeries before they were cured of vaginal fistula. The period between 1845 and 1849 during which Sims operated on enslaved women was one during which the new practice of anesthesia was not universally accepted as safe and effective. While Sims did not use anesthesia in the experiments he performed on enslaved women, he later used it on white female patients. In 1874, Irish servant Mary Rafferty came to Roberts Bartholow of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio for treatment of a head lesion. The lesion was diagnosed as a cancerous ulcer and surgical treatments were attempted. Bartholow saw Rafferty's condition as terminal but felt there was a research opportunity. With no intention of treating her, he inserted electrode needles into her exposed brain matter to gauge her responses. Although Rafferty came out of the coma caused by the experiment three days later, she died from a massive seizure the following day. Bartholow described his experiment as follows:

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Unethical human experimentation in the United States: A subject of the Tuskegee syphilis experiment has his blood drawn, c. 1953.
A subject of the Tuskegee syphilis experiment has his blood drawn, c. 1953.
Unethical human experimentation in the United States: Doctor draws blood from a subject involved in the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, circa 1932
Doctor draws blood from a subject involved in the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, circa 1932
Unethical human experimentation in the United States: Letter from Dr. John C. Cutler requesting the collection of samples from deceased victims of the Guatemala syphilis experiment
Letter from Dr. John C. Cutler requesting the collection of samples from deceased victims of the Guatemala syphilis experiment
Unethical human experimentation in the United States: Cover of the final report of Project 4.1, which examined the effects of radioactive fallout on the natives of the Marshall Islands
Cover of the final report of Project 4.1, which examined the effects of radioactive fallout on the natives of the Marshall Islands
Unethical human experimentation in the United States: Chloracne resulting from exposure to dioxins, such as those that Albert Kligman injected into prisoners at the Holmesburg Prison
Chloracne resulting from exposure to dioxins, such as those that Albert Kligman injected into prisoners at the Holmesburg Prison

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Unethical human experimentation in the United States

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Unethical human experimentation in the United States claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In biology, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Unethical human experimentation in the United States before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Unethical human experimentation in the United States ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Unethical human experimentation in the United States

In research
Unethical human experimentation in the United States appears in biology research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Unethical human experimentation in the United States in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Unethical human experimentation in the United States is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics American medical research, Clinical research ethics, History of medicine in the United States, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Unethical human experimentation in the United States outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Unethical human experimentation in the United States” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Unethical human experimentation in the United States in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Unethical human experimentation in the United States means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Unethical human experimentation in the United States out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Unethical human experimentation in the United States in simple terms?

Numerous experiments which were performed on human test subjects in the United States in the past are now considered to have been unethical, because they were performed without the knowledge or informed consent of the test subjects. Such tests have been performed throughout American history, but ha…

Why does Unethical human experimentation in the United States matter?

Because it connects several biology ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Unethical human experimentation in the United States?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Unethical human experimentation in the United States.

Tags

  • American medical research
  • Clinical research ethics
  • History of medicine in the United States
  • Human rights abuses in the United States
  • Human subject research in the United States
  • Suffering
  • United States military scandals

Keep exploring