Venomics is the study of proteins associated with venom, a toxic substance secreted by animals, which is typically injected either offensively or defensively into prey or aggressors, respectively.
Background
Venom is produced in a specialised gland (or glands) and is delivered through hollow fangs or a stinger in a process called envenomation. The main function of venom is to disrupt the physiological processes of the wounded animal through neurotoxic, cytotoxic, myotoxic, or haemotoxic mechanisms. This can then help in certain processes such as procuring prey or in defense from predators. Venom has evolved many times in multiple phyla, each having developed their own unique types of venom and methods of delivery independently. However, due to the excessive amounts of venomous animals in the world, they are the major cause of animal-related deaths (~ 57,000 in 2013) than non-venomous animals (~22,000). For example, globally, someone is bitten by a snake every 10 seconds, according to estimates. Snakes are responsible for more than 5.4 million biting-injuries, resulting to 1.8 - 2.7 million envenomings and around 81,410 to 137,880 deaths annually. Bites by venomous snakes can cause acute medical emergencies involving severe paralysis that may prevent breathing, cause bleeding disorders that can lead to fatal haemorrhage, cause irreversible kidney failure and severe local tissue destruction that can cause permanent disability and limb amputation. Children may suffer more severe effects and can experience the effects more quickly than adults due to their smaller body mass. With venomic methods, venom can be co-opted into beneficial substances such as new medicines and effective insecticides. For instance, Captopril® (Enalapril), Integrilin® (Eptifibatide) and Aggrastat® (Tirofiban) are drugs based on snake venoms, which have been approved by the FDA. In addition to these approved drugs, many other snake venom components are now involved in preclinical or clinical trials for a variety of therapeutic applications.
The Creation and History of Venomics Techniques Venom is made up of multiple proteinous components, with each component differing in its structural complexity. Venom can be a mixture of simplistic peptides, secondary (α-helices and β-sheets) structured proteins and tertiary structured proteins (crystalline structures). Furthermore, depending on the organism, there can be fundamental differences in the strategies they incorporate in their venom contents, the biggest difference being between invertebrates and vertebrates. For example, the majority of funnel-web spider's venom was made up of peptides between 3-5 KDa (75%), with the remaining peptides being between 6.5 and 8.5 KDa in mass. Conversely, snake venom is made up of more complex protein such as modified saliva proteins (CRISPs & kallikrein) and protein families that have had their genes recruited from other tissue groups (Acetylcholinesterase, crotasin, defensin & cystatin). Due to this extraordinary amount of variation in the components that make up venom, a new field was needed to identify and categorise the millions of bioactive molecules that are found within the venom. Therefore, by combining the methods of multiple fields such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and bioinformatics, an aptly named new field emerged named venomics. Venomics was first established in the latter half of the 20th century as different ‘-omic’ technologies began to rise in popularity. However, the progression of venomics since its inception has always been reliant on and limited by the advancement of technology. Juan Calvete draws attention to this with explicitly when detailing the history of venomics. He declares that ''the last revolutions made in venomics research in the last decade (1989–1999) are the direct result of advancements made in proteomic-centered methods and the indirect result of more widely available and cost-effective forms of transcriptomics and bio-informatics analysis''. One of the first popular research topics of venomics was the pharmacological properties of the polypeptide toxins found in snake venom (Specifically, Elapidae and Hydrophidae) due to the neurotoxic properties and their ability to cause respiratory failure in animals. However, due to the lack of competent technology, less complex techniques (such dialysis to separate the venom), followed by simplistic chromatography and electrophoresis analysis, research was limited.
Evidence of early interest in snake venom was prevalent throughout the early 20th century with one of the first big breakthroughs being in the mid-1960s. For example, Halbert Raudonat was one of the first researchers to fractionate Cobra (Naja nivea) venom using a sophisticated dialysis and paper chromatography techniques. Furthermore, Evert Karlsson and David Eaker were able to successfully purify the specific neurotoxins found in Cobra (Naja nigricollis) venom and found that those isolated polypeptides had a consistent molecular weight of around 7000. Future research in this field would eventually lead to indirect predictive models and then direct crystal structures of important many protein superfamilies. For example, Barbara Low was one of the first to release a 3D structure of the three-finger protein (TFP), Erabutoxin-b. TFPs are an example of α-Neurotoxins, they are small in structure (~60-80 amino acid length) and are a predominant component found in many snake venoms (representing up to 70%-95% of all toxins).
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

![Venomics: A typical workflow for the isolation and screening of compounds found in venom.[22]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/02/Venomics_workflow.png/500px-Venomics_workflow.png?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=parser&utm_content=thumbnail)
![Venomics: (Left) Representation of Bottom-up and Top-down proteomic analysis. (Right) Similarities and differences between the Proteomic and the Transcriptomics/Genomics analytical methods.[26]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/Proteomic_analysis.png/500px-Proteomic_analysis.png?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=parser&utm_content=thumbnail)
![Venomics: The finding of (Left) proteomic practices and (Right) transcriptomic practices when analysing the venomone of the Bothropoides pauloensis [28].](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fe/Analysing_the_venomone.png/500px-Analysing_the_venomone.png?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=parser&utm_content=thumbnail)
