In syntax, verb-initial (V1) word order is a word order in which the verb appears before the subject and the object. In the more narrow sense, this term is used specifically to describe the word order of V1 languages (a V1 language being a language where the word order is obligatorily or predominantly verb-initial). V1 clauses only occur in V1 languages and other languages with a dominant V1 order displaying other properties that correlate with verb-initiality and that are crucial to many analyses of V1. V1 languages are estimated to make up 12–19% of the world’s languages. V1 languages constitute a diverse group from different language families. They include Afroasiatic, Biu-Mandara, Surmic, and Nilo-Saharan languages in Africa; Celtic languages in Europe; Mayan and Oto-Manguean languages in North and Central America; Salish, Wakashan, and Tsimshianic languages in North America; Arawakan languages in South America; Austronesian languages in Southeast Asia. Some languages are ordered strictly as verb–subject–object (VSO), for example Q’anjob’al (Mayan). Others are ordered strictly as verb–object–subject (VOS), for example Malagasy (Austronesian). Many alternate between VSO and VOS, an example being Ojibwe (Algonquian).
Examples The following examples illustrate the rigid VOS and VSO languages and the VOS/VSO-alternating languages.: Q’anjob’al (VSO)
Malagasy (VOS)
Ojibwe (VOS/VSO)
Word-order correlations Verb-initial languages pattern with SVO languages on many of their word orders. The similarity between the word orders typical for both verb-initial languages and SVO languages has led many typologists to refer to all of these as simply VO languages. According to Matthew Dryer’s 1992 study of a worldwide sample of languages, the majority of VO languages (of which verb-initial languages are a subtype) have the following word order tendencies: Strong tendencies:
Adjective comes before standard of comparison Verb comes before adpositional phrase Adpositions come before the noun phrase (i.e. they are prepositions) Verb comes before manner adverb Copula comes before nominal or adjectival predicate Auxiliary comes before verb (for those languages that have auxiliaries) Negative auxiliary comes before verb (for those languages that have negative auxiliaries) Complementizer comes before sentence Adverbial subordinator comes before sentence Weak tendencies:
Head noun comes before genitive noun Question particle comes before sentence (in those languages that have question particles) Article comes before noun (in those languages that have articles)
Theoretical approaches
Functionalist approach Many functional linguists do not posit an underlying syntactic tree in which a verb-initial language is SVO. Rather than try to find ways to derive the structures of verb-initial languages from underlyingly SVO structures, functional linguists would look at how cognitive principles make it possible for languages to have different word orders and why certain word orders are more common, less common, or almost non-existent. Russell Tomlin (in his 1986 paper "Basic word order. Functional principles") argued that there are three cognitively grounded principles which can account for the observed distributions of the frequencies of word order in human languages. The three principles are:
Topic-first principle (more topical NPs come before less topical NPs) Animate-first principle (NPs with more animate referents come before NPs with less animate referents) Verb-object bonding principle (objects are more closely linked to the verb than subjects are) Since subjects are generally more likely than objects to be topics and to have animate referents, the topic-first principle and the animate-first principle both cause a strong tendency in languages to prefer the subject to go before the object. Thus, languages where the object comes before the subject are rare. Of the three possible word orders in which the subject comes before the object (VSO, SVO, and SOV), the VSO is less common because of the verb-object bonding principle, which states that objects tend to be more closely tied to verbs than subjects are (which is supported by phenomena such as object incorporation being found in many languages). Because of this principle, the two orders in which the object and verb are placed next to each other (SVO and SOV) are more common than VSO. The way the three principles interact to produce stark differences in frequencies between the word orders is illustrated by the table below (the assumption is that the more of the three principles a particular word order satisfies the more frequent it would be):
According to the table above, the application of these three principles would predict the following hierarchy in the relative frequencies of word order: SOV=SVO > VSO > VOS=OVS > OSV This prediction roughly corresponds to the real frequencies observed in the world's languages:
SOV: 44.8% SVO: 41.8% VSO: 9.2% VOS: 3.0% OVS: 1.2% OSV: 0.0%
Generative approach There are a number of different solutions proposed for deriving V1 word order in the generative framework. These solutions include the movement of the verb or verbal phrase from traditional SVO sentences, lowering the subject from a higher position, such as Spec-IP to adjoin to a projection of the verb, or stipulating that the specifier is right branching instead of the more common left branching specifiers found in X-bar theory.
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.





