ArticleslgStudy

mathematics

Weak equivalence (homotopy theory)

Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) is a mathematics topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) rather than just read about it. In short: In mathematics, a weak equivalence is a notion from homotopy theory that in some sense identifies objects that have the same "shape". This notion is formalized in the axiomatic definition of a model category.

Key takeaways

  • Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) belongs to mathematics; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

In mathematics, a weak equivalence is a notion from homotopy theory that in some sense identifies objects that have the same "shape". This notion is formalized in the axiomatic definition of a model category. A model category is a category with classes of morphisms called weak equivalences, fibrations, and cofibrations, satisfying several axioms. The associated homotopy category of a model category has the same objects, but the morphisms are changed in order to make the weak equivalences into isomorphisms. It is a useful observation that the associated homotopy category depends only on the weak equivalences, not on the fibrations and cofibrations.

Topological spaces Model categories were defined by Quillen as an axiomatization of homotopy theory that applies to topological spaces, but also to many other categories in algebra and geometry. The example that started the subject is the category of topological spaces with Serre fibrations as fibrations and weak homotopy equivalences as weak equivalences (the cofibrations for this model structure can be described as the retracts of relative cell complexes X ⊆ Y). By definition, a continuous mapping f: X → Y of spaces is called a weak homotopy equivalence if the induced function on sets of path components

f ∗ : π 0 ( X ) → π 0 ( Y ) {\displaystyle f_{*}\colon \pi _{0}(X)\to \pi _{0}(Y)}

is bijective, and for every point x in X and every n ≥ 1, the induced homomorphism

f ∗ : π n ( X , x ) → π n ( Y , f ( x ) ) {\displaystyle f_{*}\colon \pi _{n}(X,x)\to \pi _{n}(Y,f(x))}

on homotopy groups is bijective. (For X and Y path-connected, the first condition is automatic, and it suffices to state the second condition for a single point x in X.) Whitehead theorem implies that weak homotopy equivalence between CW-complexes actually is a homotopy equivalence. For simply connected topological spaces X and Y, a map f: X → Y is a weak homotopy equivalence if and only if the induced homomorphism f*: Hn(X,Z) → Hn(Y,Z) on singular homology groups is bijective for all n. Likewise, for simply connected spaces X and Y, a map f: X → Y is a weak homotopy equivalence if and only if the pullback homomorphism f*: Hn(Y,Z) → Hn(X,Z) on singular cohomology is bijective for all n. Example: Let X be the set of natural numbers {0, 1, 2, ...} and let Y be the set {0} ∪ {1, 1/2, 1/3, ...}, both with the subspace topology from the real line. Define f: X → Y by mapping 0 to 0 and n to 1/n for positive integers n. Then f is continuous, and in fact a weak homotopy equivalence, but it is not a homotopy equivalence. The homotopy category of topological spaces (obtained by inverting the weak homotopy equivalences) greatly simplifies the category of topological spaces. Indeed, this homotopy category is equivalent to the category of CW complexes with morphisms being homotopy classes of continuous maps. Many other model structures on the category of topological spaces have also been considered. For example, in the Strøm model structure on topological spaces, the fibrations are the Hurewicz fibrations and the weak equivalences are the homotopy equivalences.

Chain complexes Some other important model categories involve chain complexes. Let A be a Grothendieck abelian category, for example the category of modules over a ring or the category of sheaves of abelian groups on a topological space. Define a category C(A) with objects the complexes X of objects in A,

⋯ → X 1 → X 0 → X − 1 → ⋯ , {\displaystyle \cdots \to X_{1}\to X_{0}\to X_{-1}\to \cdots ,}

and morphisms the chain maps. (It is equivalent to consider "cochain complexes" of objects of A, where the numbering is written as

⋯ → X − 1 → X 0 → X 1 → ⋯ , {\displaystyle \cdots \to X^{-1}\to X^{0}\to X^{1}\to \cdots ,}

simply by defining Xi = X−i.) The category C(A) has a model structure in which the cofibrations are the monomorphisms and the weak equivalences are the quasi-isomorphisms. By definition, a chain map f: X → Y is a quasi-isomorphism if the induced homomorphism

f ∗ : H n ( X ) → H n ( Y ) {\displaystyle f_{*}\colon H_{n}(X)\to H_{n}(Y)}

on homology is an isomorphism for all integers n. (Here Hn(X) is the object of A defined as the kernel of Xn → Xn−1 modulo the image of Xn+1 → Xn.) The resulting homotopy category is called the derived category D(A).

Trivial fibrations and trivial cofibrations In any model category, a fibration that is also a weak equivalence is called a trivial (or acyclic) fibration. A cofibration that is also a weak equivalence is called a trivial (or acyclic) cofibration.

Notes

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Weak equivalence (homotopy theory)

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In mathematics, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Weak equivalence (homotopy theory)

In research
Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) appears in mathematics research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Equivalence (mathematics), Homological algebra, Homotopy theory, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Weak equivalence (homotopy theory)” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) in simple terms?

In mathematics, a weak equivalence is a notion from homotopy theory that in some sense identifies objects that have the same "shape". This notion is formalized in the axiomatic definition of a model category.

Why does Weak equivalence (homotopy theory) matter?

Because it connects several mathematics ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Weak equivalence (homotopy theory)?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Weak equivalence (homotopy theory).

Tags

  • Equivalence (mathematics)
  • Homological algebra
  • Homotopy theory

Keep exploring