ArticleslgStudy

science

Western Pseudohistory Theory

Western Pseudohistory Theory is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Western Pseudohistory Theory rather than just read about it. In short: The term "Western Pseudohistory Theory" (simplified Chinese: 西方伪史论; traditional Chinese: 西方偽史論; pinyin: Xīfāng wěi shǐ lùn) is a catch-all term referring to a series of Russian-inspired Chinese fringe theories that question the authenticity and reliability of Western history, and which generally hold that the histories of ancient Greece, ancient Egypt, and ancient Rome contain a large number of fabrications, or even…

Western Pseudohistory Theory — main illustration
Western Pseudohistory Theory — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Western Pseudohistory Theory belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Western Pseudohistory Theory to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Western Pseudohistory Theory from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The term "Western Pseudohistory Theory" (simplified Chinese: 西方伪史论; traditional Chinese: 西方偽史論; pinyin: Xīfāng wěi shǐ lùn) is a catch-all term referring to a series of Russian-inspired Chinese fringe theories that question the authenticity and reliability of Western history, and which generally hold that the histories of ancient Greece, ancient Egypt, and ancient Rome contain a large number of fabrications, or even that all of them are fabricated. Many elements of this theory are borrowed from the Russian mathematician Anatoly Fomenko's new chronology theory, and the term has thus been traced back to 18th-century French priest and classical scholar Jean Hardouin. In 2013, after He Xin, a former researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), published his book Research on Pseudo-history of Greece questioning the existence of ancient Greece, this theory gradually spread on the Chinese Internet. The Chinese historiography and classics community either completely disagrees with this theory or simply does not want to spend time refuting these claims.

History At the end of the twentieth century, Fomenko put forward some fringe theories in his books that questioned world history, for example, he argued that no artifacts had been found in Russia prior to the 10th century A.D., and therefore world history could not have predated the 10th century A.D. Fomenko's theory was heavily criticized by historians. An article in Xinmin Weekly, an article in Southern Weekly, and an article by Chow Hin in Orange News, all cite Fomenko as one of the origins the theory, with the Xinmin Weekly's article going even further back to Hardouin. In 2013, He Xin published Research on Pseudo-history of Greece, which claimed that there were a large number of fabrications in the history of Greece. In 2015, Du Gangjian put forward the theory of Out-of-Hunan, which argued that human beings did not originate from Africa, but from Hunan. In 2018, a documentary produced by Gleb Nosovsky made Fomenko's theories spread on the Chinese Internet, and in July 2019, the Chinese-British scholar Zhu Xuanshi said that there was no history of Europe before the 15th century, and that Western civilization had faked the three civilizations of ancient Greece, Egypt and Rome with reference to Chinese culture. The same year, Xiang Qianjing, the CEO of Beijing Tairen Classic Chinese Medicine Technology Co., Ltd, interested in the theory, funded and proposed to hold a "Western History Falsification and Chinese Culture Renaissance Symposium" every two years, which led to the further dissemination of the theory in China. In February 2021, Huang Heqing, a professor of art history at Zhejiang University, stated in a lecture that the Great Pyramid of Giza and the Great Sphinx of Giza were fakes. An analysis of videos on the Chinese video site Bilibili shows that the earliest relevant videos were posted in 2019, after which the number of relevant videos rose in 2021 and became popular on the platform in 2022. In 2024, Chen Zhixin, an associate professor at Beijing Normal University, uploaded lecture videos to Bilibili claiming that Greek and ancient Roman civilizations were "pseudohistory" fabricated by the West. In June 2025, a number of personal media accounts promoting the theory were banned.

Details

Ancient Egypt Fomenko asserted that the pyramids were fabricated by the Egyptian government in 1901 using concrete blocks for the development of tourism because of small holes in the construction materials. Huang Heqing said in 2021 that the pyramids were fabricated by the Egyptians using concrete in order to "belittle the Chinese civilization". In August 2025, Huang Heqing and others debated with Tang Jigen and others on issues such as the age of the grass-woven artifacts in the Shanghai Museum's ancient Egyptian artifact exhibition. Huang Heqing said that the artifacts in the exhibition were "brand new."

Ancient Greece, Italy and the Renaissance

In 2013, He Xin, a former researcher at the CASS, published Research on Pseudo-history of Greece. In the book, He argued that all ancient Greek classics were forged during the Renaissance. For instance, he argued that Leontius Pilatus and Giovanni Boccaccio tampered with the original text of the Iliad in the course of translating it from Greek to Latin, commissioned by Francesco Petrarch, and that this tampered Latin translation became the reference text for later translations in other languages, and He Xin claimed that this series of events was manipulated by the Freemasons. In addition, the existence of Aristotle had also been questioned, as He Xin argued that Aristotle himself did not exist, based on the fact that, due to the problem of transcription, Miao Litian, the author of the Chinese edition of the Works of Aristotle, had stated that some of Aristotle's writings may had been incorrectly copied by later generations. In 2017, Chen Ping, a professor of economics at Fudan University, expressed his agreement with Fomenko and He Xin, and stated that due to the high value of papyrus and parchment, it is impossible for ancient Greek documents to have survived intact into the Renaissance, and therefore "could only have been fabricated by people hired by Italian bankers during the Renaissance". In addition, documents in Arabic introduced to Europe during the Renaissance were also thought to be non-existent, and Chen Ping believed that they were fabricated by the House of Medici. In 2023, a video clip of Jin Canrong went viral on the Internet in which he claimed that ancient Greek philosophers, including Aristotle, did not exist because no relevant written records, according to him, could be found prior to the 13th century. In 2024, in an interview with Southern Weekly, Huang Heqing argued that ancient Greek sculpture and architecture were too fine, and also argued that ancient Greece at that time could not have had iron tools, so it was impossible to sculpt; while ancient Greece's rivals in this period were fabricated to play as a rivalry to Western history, for example, the temperature of the Iranian plateau was very high in the spring so that it was not possible to give birth to such a state as the Achaemenid Empire.

Industrialization According to some self-publishers, the steam engine and electricity were alleged ancient Chinese inventions, and the Industrial Revolution was allegedly based on stolen technology from the Yongle Dadian.

Reception

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Western Pseudohistory Theory

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Western Pseudohistory Theory claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Western Pseudohistory Theory before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Western Pseudohistory Theory ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Western Pseudohistory Theory

In research
Western Pseudohistory Theory appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Western Pseudohistory Theory in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Western Pseudohistory Theory is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Alternative chronologies, Anti-Western sentiment, Chinese nationalism, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Western Pseudohistory Theory outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Western Pseudohistory Theory” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Western Pseudohistory Theory in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Western Pseudohistory Theory means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Western Pseudohistory Theory out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Western Pseudohistory Theory in simple terms?

The term "Western Pseudohistory Theory" (simplified Chinese: 西方伪史论; traditional Chinese: 西方偽史論; pinyin: Xīfāng wěi shǐ lùn) is a catch-all term referring to a series of Russian-inspired Chinese fringe theories that question the authenticity and reliability of Western history, and which generally ho…

Why does Western Pseudohistory Theory matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Western Pseudohistory Theory?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Western Pseudohistory Theory.

Tags

  • Alternative chronologies
  • Anti-Western sentiment
  • Chinese nationalism
  • Conspiracy theories in China
  • Freemasonry-related controversies
  • Historical negationism in China
  • Historiography of Egypt
  • Historiography of ancient Greece
  • History of the foreign relations of China
  • Pseudohistory
  • Roman historiography

Keep exploring