ArticleslgStudy

physics

Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System

Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System is a physics topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System rather than just read about it. In short: The Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System (WEMS) is an environmental governance and information-sharing system designed to support the monitoring of wildlife crime, illegal wildlife trade, and enforcement of wildlife-related legislation. It uses geographic information system (GIS) technology together with spatial and non-spatial information to facilitate the collection, analysis, and sharing of information relevant…

Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System — main illustration
Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System belongs to physics; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System (WEMS) is an environmental governance and information-sharing system designed to support the monitoring of wildlife crime, illegal wildlife trade, and enforcement of wildlife-related legislation. It uses geographic information system (GIS) technology together with spatial and non-spatial information to facilitate the collection, analysis, and sharing of information relevant to wildlife law enforcement and compliance with multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs).

WEMS was initially developed in the context of challenges associated with the flow of enforcement information between national institutions and international organisations involved in the implementation of MEAs, including the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). The system was designed to provide an information technology framework through which information could move from local and national levels towards organisations involved in monitoring enforcement and compliance. The development of WEMS has involved researchers, government agencies, United Nations organisations, wildlife enforcement institutions, and other stakeholders. The initiative has subsequently been associated with research into transboundary information sharing, environmental governance, and the use of digital technologies in wildlife law enforcement.

Purpose and functions The original concept for WEMS was to address gaps in the collection, management, and exchange of information concerning wildlife crime and the enforcement of environmental agreements. The system was designed to integrate spatial and non-spatial information and to support the analysis of wildlife crime incidents at different geographic and administrative levels. The first WEMS prototype included an interactive map and functions for examining the geographical and temporal distribution of wildlife crime information. The system was also designed to support the analysis of potential routes associated with illegal wildlife trade and to generate structured information based on wildlife crime incidents. The WEMS concept subsequently evolved towards a model in which governments and national enforcement agencies retained responsibility for enforcement information while selected information could be shared with regional and international bodies. This reflected concerns about data ownership, institutional mandates, confidentiality, and the political and organisational barriers associated with transboundary information sharing. The system was therefore conceived not only as a technological platform but also as an institutional and governance framework for improving the flow of information relevant to wildlife enforcement and compliance with environmental agreements.

History

Early development The development of WEMS took place in the early 2000s in response to concerns about limitations in the availability and exchange of information relating to wildlife crime and environmental enforcement. The initial approach sought to develop a database containing both spatial and non-spatial information and to provide a common platform for information sharing. The first prototype of WEMS was released in 2006 using data from Japan. The prototype incorporated spatial information on wildlife crime and included mapping and analytical functions. It was designed in part around information structures associated with the INTERPOL ecomessage framework. The system was presented at meetings involving the international wildlife enforcement community, including a CITES Mekong regional meeting and an INTERPOL Wildlife Working Group meeting in 2006. It was subsequently demonstrated to representatives of the CITES community at the fourteenth Conference of the Parties (CoP14), held in The Hague in 2007. Following the initial prototype, the WEMS system was redesigned to respond more directly to the requirements of national governments and wildlife law enforcement agencies. The revised approach placed greater emphasis on the role of governments as custodians of enforcement information. The redesigned system was presented at the CITES Enforcement Expert Group meeting in 2009 and at the fifteenth CITES Conference of the Parties (CoP15) in Doha in 2010.

Development in Africa WEMS was subsequently developed as a transboundary information-sharing and geospatial decision-support concept in Africa. The African implementation involved the Lusaka Agreement Task Force (LATF), the United Nations University (UNU), and the Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) of the University of Twente. The system was implemented in a number of African countries associated with the Lusaka Agreement framework. The African implementation sought to provide a mechanism through which national wildlife enforcement agencies could manage relevant information while enabling the exchange of selected information for transboundary cooperation. The African implementation became associated with the name WEMS-Africa. The system was subsequently transferred to the Lusaka Agreement Task Force, which assumed responsibility for its continued management and operation. The experience of developing WEMS in Africa was also examined in research concerning the institutional and political challenges involved in establishing transboundary enforcement information-sharing systems. Research on WEMS found that the adoption of such systems is influenced not only by technological considerations but also by differing policy beliefs, institutional interests, and perceptions of wildlife conservation and enforcement among stakeholders.

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System: Presentation of the Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System (WEMS) at CITES CoP14, The Hague, Netherlands, presided over by Peter Pueschel (IFAW), Peter Younger (INTERPOL), Dr Remi Chandran (United Nations University) and Dr R. B. Lal, Director General of Wildlife, Ministry of Environment, Government of India.
Presentation of the Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System (WEMS) at CITES CoP14, The Hague, Netherlands, presided over by Peter Pueschel (IFAW), Peter Younger (INTERPOL), Dr Remi Chandran (United Nations University) and Dr R. B. Lal, Director General of Wildlife, Ministry of Environment, Government of India.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In physics, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System

In research
Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System appears in physics research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Animal welfare, International environmental law, Wildlife smuggling, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System in simple terms?

The Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System (WEMS) is an environmental governance and information-sharing system designed to support the monitoring of wildlife crime, illegal wildlife trade, and enforcement of wildlife-related legislation. It uses geographic information system (GIS) technology toget…

Why does Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System matter?

Because it connects several physics ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System.

Tags

  • Animal welfare
  • International environmental law
  • Wildlife smuggling

Keep exploring