Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Victor Mair uses the acronym WLCKJ) is a 1995 book by Insup Taylor and M. Martin Taylor, published by John Benjamins Publishing Company. Kim Ainsworth-Darnell, in The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, wrote that the work "is intended as an introduction for the Western reader to the writing systems of East Asia." William C. Hannas of Georgetown University described it as "the first sustained treatment of writing in East Asia." Nobu Akamatsu of Kochi University stated that the book was intended for "novices from various backgrounds" rather than academics with extensive experience related to East Asia. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy wrote that the book was not only intended for "the general public" but also for "academic readers". Kathryn Allen of the University of Reading wrote that the comparing of the writing systems of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean was the more important aspect than the overview of the languages. In 2014 a revised version was published.
Background Insup Taylor, who was born in Korea, and employed by the University of Toronto, is in the psycholinguistic field. She studied East Asian languages and did the bulk of the work. She has fluency in both Korean and Japanese. The co-author is her husband. The book used primary sources written in each of the three languages as well as ones in English.
Contents The book has an introductory chapter about linguistics and writing systems. Beyond that, it has a section on each of the three languages: Chinese is in Part 1, Korean is in Part 2, and Japanese is in Part 3. Each section has an initial chapter with background information on the language, followed by one or more chapters about writing systems for that particular language and discussion on why each system still uses Chinese characters; each also has a bibliography for that section. The book does not have information on dialects. On Vietnam it mentions the country on a single page but has no further discussion. The section on Korean also discusses the role of Hangul, and of Hanja (spelled "Hancha"), as well as attempts to completely discontinue the latter and why such never happened. The section on Japanese also discusses hiragana and katakana, as well as mora and its role in haiku. The book has information from experiments in the psycholinguistic field. It also includes anecdotes and quotes. The book argues that Koreans should again begin to use Chinese characters.
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
