ArticleslgStudy

science

X-15 Flight 3-65-97

X-15 Flight 3-65-97 is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand X-15 Flight 3-65-97 rather than just read about it. In short: X-15 Flight 3-65-97, also known as X-15 Flight 191 (being the 191st free flight of the X-15), was a sub-orbital spaceflight of the North American X-15 experimental spaceplane, carrying seven experiments to a peak altitude of 266,000 feet (50.4 mi; 81 km; 43.8 nmi), above NASA's definition of the start of space at 50 miles (80 km) but below the Kármán line definition at 100 kilometres (62 mi). The flight, on November…

X-15 Flight 3-65-97 — main illustration
X-15 Flight 3-65-97 — illustration

Key takeaways

  • X-15 Flight 3-65-97 belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect X-15 Flight 3-65-97 to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of X-15 Flight 3-65-97 from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

X-15 Flight 3-65-97, also known as X-15 Flight 191 (being the 191st free flight of the X-15), was a sub-orbital spaceflight of the North American X-15 experimental spaceplane, carrying seven experiments to a peak altitude of 266,000 feet (50.4 mi; 81 km; 43.8 nmi), above NASA's definition of the start of space at 50 miles (80 km) but below the Kármán line definition at 100 kilometres (62 mi). The flight, on November 15, 1967, ended when the aircraft broke apart during its descent due to technical difficulties, killing the pilot Michael J. Adams and destroying the aircraft.

Mission overview Adams's seventh X-15 flight took place on November 15, 1967, in the number three aircraft. At 10:30 in the morning on November 15, the X-15-3 was released from the wing of NB-52B mothership at 14,000 m (45,000 ft) over Delamar Dry Lake. Experiments and tests on this flight to 266,000 feet were:

Boost guidance experiment Solar spectrum measurement Ultraviolet plume detection Micrometeorites collection Wingtip pod deflection photography Test of Saturn V booster insulation on X-15 reentry Test of traversing probe in a wingtip experiment pod While in powered flight, an electrical disturbance distracted Adams and slightly degraded the control of the aircraft; having adequate backup controls, Adams continued. At 10:33, he reached a peak altitude of 81,000 m (266,000 ft). In the NASA 1 control room, mission controller Pete Knight monitored the mission with a team of engineers. As the X-15 climbed, Adams began a planned wing-rocking (rolling) maneuver so an on-board camera could scan the horizon. At the conclusion of the wing-rocking portion of the climb, the X-15 had begun a slow drift in heading; 40 seconds later, when the aircraft had reached its maximum altitude, it was off heading by 15 degrees to the left. As Adams came over the top, the drift briefly halted as the aircraft's nose yawed 15 degrees back to the correct attitude. Then the drift to the left began again; within 30 seconds, Adams's descending flight path was at right angles to the attitude of the aircraft. At 70,000 m (230,000 ft), while descending into the rapidly increasing density of the atmosphere, the X-15 entered a Mach 5 (5,300 km/h) spin. In the NASA 1 control room, there was no way to monitor the heading of the aircraft, so the situation was unknown to the engineers monitoring the flight. Normal conversation continued between Knight and Adams, with Knight advising Adams that he was "a little bit high", but in "real good shape". Adams radioed that the aircraft "[seemed] squirrelly", and moments later repeatedly told Knight that he had entered a spin. The ground controllers sought to get the X-15 straightened out, but there was no recommended spin recovery technique for the X-15, and engineers knew nothing about the aircraft's supersonic spin tendencies. The chase pilots, realizing that the X-15 would never make Rogers Dry Lake, headed for the emergency lakes, Ballarat and Cuddeback, in case Adams attempted an emergency landing. Adams held the X-15's controls against the spin, using both the flight controls and the reaction control jets in the nose and wings. He managed to recover from the spin at 36,000 m (118,000 ft) and went into an inverted Mach 4.7 (5,200 km/h) dive at an angle between 40 and 45 degrees. In theory, Adams was in a good position to roll upright, pull out of the dive and set up a landing. However, due to high gain in the adaptive control system, the X-15 went into limit-cycle oscillations with rapid pitching motion of increasing severity, still in a dive at 49,000 m (160,000 ft) per minute. As the X-15 neared 20,000 m (65,000 ft), it was diving at Mach 3.93 (4,200 km/h; 2,600 mph) and experiencing more than 15 g0 (150 m/s2) vertically, and 8 g0 (78 m/s2) laterally. The aircraft broke up northeast of the small Californian settlement of Johannesburg 10 minutes and 35 seconds after launch. An Air Force pilot, who was filling in for another chase pilot, spotted the main wreckage northwest of Cuddeback Lake. The aircraft was destroyed, and Adams killed. After Adams's death, a number of pilots and engineers quit the program, including John A. Manke in 1967.

Investigation NASA and the Air Force convened an accident board. Chaired by NASA's Donald R. Bellman, the board took two months to prepare its report. Ground parties scoured the countryside looking for wreckage, specifically the film from the cockpit camera. The weekend after the accident, an unofficial NASA Flight Research Center (FRC) search party found the camera, but could not find the film cartridge. FRC engineer Victor W. Horton organized a search and on November 29, during the first pass over the area, Willard E. Dives found the cassette. The accident board found that the cockpit instrumentation had been functioning properly, and concluded that Adams had lost control of the X-15 as a result of a combination of distraction, misinterpretation of his instrumentation display, and possible vertigo. The electrical disturbance early in the flight degraded the overall effectiveness of the aircraft's control system and further added to pilot workload. The board made two major recommendations: install a telemetered heading indicator in the control room, visible to the flight controller; and medically screen X-15 pilot candidates for labyrinth (vertigo) sensitivity. As a result of the X-15's crash, the FRC added a ground-based "8 ball" attitude indicator in the control room to furnish mission controllers with real time pitch, roll, yaw, heading, angle of attack, and side-slip information.

Memorials

Adams was awarded astronaut wings posthumously. His name appears on the Space Mirror Memorial.

References This article incorporates public domain material from X-15 - Biography: Michael Adams. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Citations

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

X-15 Flight 3-65-97 illustration
X-15 Flight 3-65-97: 56-6672, the X-15 involved in the accident in 1962
56-6672, the X-15 involved in the accident in 1962
X-15 Flight 3-65-97: Memorial at the crash site
Memorial at the crash site

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with X-15 Flight 3-65-97

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what X-15 Flight 3-65-97 claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to X-15 Flight 3-65-97 before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about X-15 Flight 3-65-97 ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of X-15 Flight 3-65-97

In research
X-15 Flight 3-65-97 appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses X-15 Flight 3-65-97 in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
X-15 Flight 3-65-97 is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1967 in California, Aviation accidents and incidents in California, Aviation accidents and incidents in the United States in 1967, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for X-15 Flight 3-65-97 outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “X-15 Flight 3-65-97” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study X-15 Flight 3-65-97 in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what X-15 Flight 3-65-97 means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain X-15 Flight 3-65-97 out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is X-15 Flight 3-65-97 in simple terms?

X-15 Flight 3-65-97, also known as X-15 Flight 191 (being the 191st free flight of the X-15), was a sub-orbital spaceflight of the North American X-15 experimental spaceplane, carrying seven experiments to a peak altitude of 266,000 feet (50.4 mi; 81 km; 43.8 nmi), above NASA's definition of the st…

Why does X-15 Flight 3-65-97 matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study X-15 Flight 3-65-97?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on X-15 Flight 3-65-97.

Tags

  • 1967 in California
  • Aviation accidents and incidents in California
  • Aviation accidents and incidents in the United States in 1967
  • November 1967
  • Spacecraft retirement
  • X-15 flights

Keep exploring